CA Department of Transportation
Via E-mail to Kim_Floyd@dot.ca.gov
January 30, 2009
Ms Harmon:
Regarding the Richardson Grove Operational Improvement Project Draft Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment and Programmatic Section 4 (f) Evaluation:
I am concerned that the Draft EIR for the proposed Richardson Grove Operational Improvement project is deficient in several respects.
The analysis of Project’s potential to induce growth is inadequate and appears to be biased. The DEIR states that
“Opening US Route101 in southern
However, there is no analysis of the type of growth that
would ensue. Would the likely outcome of this investment be increased growth in
The DEIR relies upon economic evaluations and predictions from an undefined sub-set of the business community
“More specifically, representatives of the business
community in
“Representatives
of the business community” is a vague entity. What percentage of
The
DEIR bases its assumptions about economic impacts and growth on the Gallo, 2008
report: Realigning Highway 101 at Richardson Grove: The Economic
Impact on Humboldt and Del Norte Counties. The report is
not included in the DEIR appendices, nor does the DEIR state where to access
this report. It does not appear to be available on the Internet. The public
should be able to readily access and review this study, and to see comments by
peer reviewers. Was the study peer reviewed?
The
Project would open the Highway 101 corridor to increased traffic, not only to
State Highway Code 887.8(b) states that:
"Where the traffic safety or capacity of the highway would be increased, the department shall pay for the construction and maintenance of non-motorized transportation facilities approximately paralleling the highway."
The proposed project does not include provisions for bicycle or pedestrian facilities. The DEIR does not address this issue.
The DEIR does not consider the viable alternative of
transporting goods by short sea shipping. This alternative would eliminate the
need for the Project and save the public money, while reducing fuel
consumption, pollution, noise and congestion.
The DEIR was informed by surveys (cited above) about potential impacts to the economy and growth. Did these surveys include questions about using short sea shipping? Lack of consideration of this alternative is a serious omission.
Diane Higgins